Saturday, May 25, 2024

 

… But Were Afraid To Ask

Parshas Behar

Posted on May 22, 2024 (5784) By Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky | Series: DrashaLevel: Beginner

The Torah does not usually leave room for official questions of faith. It tells us, in no uncertain terms, what our responsibilities are and the commitment we must make to be observant Jews.

 

Every mitzvah entails sacrifice. Sometimes it requires a monetary commitment, sometimes a commitment of time and morals. Not often does it consider the human trials one encounters in mitzvah performance. They are our problem, and we must deal with them as human beings and as Jews.

 

Yet this week the Torah uncharacteristically provides leeway for those who may waver in their commitment.

 

In Parshas Behar the Torah charges the Jewish people with the laws of shmittah. Every seventh year, we are told that the land of Israel is to lie fallow. No work is to be done with the earth.

 

There is not to be a harvest, nor may the ground be sown or reaped.

 

Observing shmittah is a true test of faith. Imagine! One must not harvest his grain but instead rely on pure faith for his daily fare. Yet the Torah does not leave us with the austere command.

 

The Torah deals directly with the human emotion related to the issue. In Leviticus 25:20 the Torah foretells a human side. “And if you will say in your heart, ‘what shall we eat in the seventh year, behold the land has not been sown nor has it been reaped?'” Hashem reassures the people that His bounty will abound in the sixth year and they will live the seventh year in comfort.

 

This is not the only time the Torah realizes human wariness. In reference to the command of conquering the Land of Canaan, the Torah states in Deuteronomy 7:17: “Perhaps you shall say in your heart, ‘these nations are more numerous than me. How will I drive them out?'” Once again Hashem reassures His nation that He will not forsake them.

 

The question is glaring. Why does the Torah answer to human psyche? Why doesn’t the Torah just command us to let the land lie fallow, or conquer the Land of Canaan? If there are problems or fears in our hearts, they are our problems. Those fears should not be incorporated as part of the command.

 

Isidore would meet his friend Irving every other week while doing business. “How are you Irving?” Isidore would always ask. “How’s the wife and kids?” Irv would always grunt back the perfunctory replies. “Fine.” “A little under the weather.” “My son Jack got a job.”

This one sided interrogation went on for years until one day Isidore exploded. “Irv,” he said abruptly.

 

“I don’t understand. For six years I ask you about your wife, your kids, and your business. Not once mind you, not once did you ever ask me about my wife, my kids, or my business!

 

Irv shrugged. “Sorry, Izzie. I was really selfish. So tell me,” he continued, “how is your wife? How are your kids? How is your business?”

 

Izzie let out a sigh of anguish and began to krechts. He put his hand gently on Irv’s shoulder, tightened his lips, and shook his head slowly. “Don’t ask!”

 

Reb Leible Eiger (1816-1888) explains that there are many questions of faith that we may have. The faithful may in fact fear the fact that there is fear. “Is it a flaw in faith to worry?” “Am I committing heresy by fearing the enemy?” “Am I allowed to ask?” The Torah tells us in two places, “you will have these questions. You will ask, ‘how am I going to sustain myself and family?’ “You will worry,” ‘how will I conquer my enemies?’ ‘Will I be destroyed?'” The Torah reassures us that there is no lack of trust by asking those questions. We mustn’t get down on ourselves and consider questions a breach of faith.

 

Life and sustenance are mortal attributes.

 

They warrant mortal fear.

 

Adam, the first man was originally blessed with eternal life without having to worry for his livelihood. After sinning, he was cursed with death and was told that he would eat by the sweat of his brow. The Torah assures us that it is not only human but also acceptable to worry about these two issues — one’s livelihood and survival, as long as we believe in the reassurances about those worries.

 

Good Shabbos!

Small Coincidences

Parshas Behar

Posted on May 23, 2019 (5779) By Rabbi Naftali Reich | Series: Legacy | Level: Beginner

Fire and thick clouds descended on Mount Sinai as millions of Jewish people trembled in awe at the foot of the mountain. And then the voice of the Almighty spoke directly to all the people, the first and last time that such an incredible divine revelation would occur in all the history of mankind. What did the Almighty say to the Jewish people on that historic day at Mount Sinai?

 

He gave them the Ten Commandments.

 

But what about the rest of the Torah? Where and when was that given to the Jewish people? In fact, all the rest of the Torah was also given to the Jewish people at Mount Sinai. The encampment remained at the foot of the mountain for over a year, and during this time, Moses taught the entire Torah to the Jewish people, and the process of study began.

 

This week’s portion, however, when presenting the laws of the sabbatical year, opens with a strange statement. “And Hashem spoke to Moses at Mount Sinai, saying . . .” What is the connection between Mount Sinai and the sabbatical year? wonders the Talmud. After all, wasn’t the entire Torah taught at Mount Sinai. Why make particular mention of Mount Sinai with regard to one commandment?

 

The Talmud explains that this we are meant to draw a parallel from this commandment to all the other commandments in the Torah. Just as the laws of the sabbatical year, which require that the land be left fallow every seventh year, were taught in full at Mount Sinai so too were all the laws of the Torah taught there.

 

The question remains: Why were the laws of the sabbatical year singled out as the example which all the other laws follow?

 

The commentators point to an interesting passage a little deeper into the Torah portion we are reading this week. “And if you shall say, ‘What will we eat in the seventh year? Behold, we cannot plant nor gather in our produce,’ then I will command My blessing for you in the sixth year, and it will yield enough produce for three years.”

 

What an amazing statement! Here is clear proof (among many others) of the divine origin of the Torah. First of all, do laws of the sabbatical year sound like something people would make up?

 

And even if we could conjure up some motivation for instituting such laws, how exactly did they plan to deliver on the three-for-one crop in the sixth year? This was not written by men. It couldn’t have been.

 

This, the commentators explain, is the point the Torah is making here. Just as the sabbatical laws were formulated by the Almighty and not by men, so too are all the other laws of the Torah from Mount Sinai, divine in origin and not the product of human imagination.

 

A man, who had business in a distant city, bid his wife farewell, left his apartment and went out to the street to find a taxi. To his delight, a taxi was standing at the curbside. At the airport, he found a skycap waiting to take his luggage just as he opened his door. His ticket was waiting for him at the counter, and once again, he was delighted to discover he had been assigned his favorite seat. What wonderful coincidences, he thought.

 

The coincidences continued throughout his trip, and he marveled at his good fortune. Finally, he arrived at the hotel in the city of his destination and found that a delicious meal had been prepared for him. Moreover, the food was prepared and arranged exactly as he preferred it!

 

Aha! he thought. This is too much to attribute to coincidence. Now I clearly see my wife’s loving hand.

 

She made sure that I was happy and comfortable every step of the way. I must thank her not only for the meal, but for every convenience I have so fortuitously encountered on my trip.

 

In our own lives, most of us can easily think of at least one or two times when we saw clearly the Almighty’s hand leading us through difficult times. But think about it. Doesn’t it stand to reason that all the other good things that have happened to us in the normal course of events, all the little coincidences that we are so accustomed to taking for granted, all of these were also engineered by the loving hand of the Almighty? Once we come to this realization, our relationship with Him will rise to a new level and will be forever spiritually enriched.


Familiarity Breeds Respect

 

Anticipation. What a wonderful feeling. As the long-awaited event draws ever closer, we cannot help but count the days. Five days left. Four days. The excitement builds and builds until it is almost unbearable.

 

We experience this excited anticipation at this time of the year, during the days of Sefiras Haomer, when we count down towards the Giving of the Torah on Shavuos. But the count does not follow the expected pattern. We do not count 49, 48, 47 and so on, calculating the diminishing number of days remaining. Instead, we count 1, 2, 3 and so on, calculating the days that have already passed. Why is this so?

 

A look into this week’s Torah portion offers an illuminating insight. Hashem reassures us that if we are faithful to the Torah, He will shower us with blessings. Among these is the promise to “place My Abode among you, and I will not be revolted by you.” The choice of words here is quite puzzling. If Hashem chooses to establish His Abode among the Jewish people, why in the world would He be revolted by them?

 

The answer lies in a very familiar concept. We have always been conditioned to believe that “familiarity breeds contempt,” and indeed, it is true in most cases. When we observe a person from afar, we develop an idealized impression formed of his most striking characteristics. But as we become more familiar, as we draw closer, we begin to notice the minute faults, the moles and warts, both literal and figurative, that are not visible from afar. We no longer think of this person as such a paragon of virtue but as an ordinary person with human failings – if not worse. Furthermore, a relationship that falls into familiarity loses its glamour and mystique. The old thrill is often gone.

 

One might have thought, therefore, that when the Creator chose to establish His Abode among the Jewish people it would spell the beginning of the end for His special relationship with them.

 

Although, He certainly is all-seeing and all-knowing, when the shortcomings and foibles of the Jewish are not brought into the spotlight of the Divine Presence, so to speak, they are not as easily dismissed. When Hashem actually dwells among the Jewish people, a higher standard of behavior is required; anything less would be “revolting” to Him. From the side of the people, furthermore, one might have thought that the thrill of having the Divine Presence among them would eventually dissipate, and the people would take it for granted, once again causing Him to be “revolted,” so to speak. Therefore, Hashem reassures us that this will not happen. The relationship would grow ever stronger, breeding respect not contempt.

 

During the days of Sefiras Haomer, our counting is not merely an emotional outburst of impatience and anticipation. Rather, it is a sober expression of a gradual process of drawing closer to Hashem, whereby each day is a building block resting on the previous day and forming a foundation for the next.

 

As we contemplate the approach of the awesome Giving of the Torah, as we condition our inner selves to become attuned to the eternal truths of the universe, we undergo a process of growth. As we draw closer to the Creator, we are increasingly overwhelmed by His infinite greatness. And we become ever more purified and more beloved to Him. The Count of the Omer, in its ideal form, is the record of this growth, of this blossoming relationship.

 

Two cross-country travelers met in a roadside inn.

 

“Tough trip,” one of them commented to the other. “But just one thousand miles to go, and I’ll reach the coast. How about you?”

 

“I’m also heading for the coast. I’ve covered two thousand miles already, and I’ve had a very good trip.”

 

“Really? Say, if we’re both going coast to coast, how come I find the trip tough and you don’t?”

The other thought for a moment, then he said, “It’s really quite simple. You say you have a thousand miles to go, which shows your mind is totally focused on the destination, and the entire trip is just terrible drudgery. I say I’ve already covered two thousand miles, which shows the trip itself has value to me. I enjoyed the spectacular vistas, seeing new places and observing their ways of life. I look at my two thousand miles as an accomplishment, and so, I’m having a very good trip.”

 

In our own lives, we acknowledge that we need to strive toward idealistic goals, to a life of goodness and spirituality, but we sometimes lose sight of the transcendent value of each passing day in helping us achieve those goals. We think that at some future time we will become more spiritual, that we will live a higher and better life. But these goals cannot be reached by a mere decision and a snap of the fingers. Only by painstakingly building a structure of days set upon days can we reach the peaks to which we aspire. And in the process, we will discover that getting there is itself a very rewarding and enriching experience.

 

Text Copyright © 2010 by Rabbi Naftali Reich and Torah.org.

 

Saturday, May 18, 2024

 

Divine Distribution

Parshas Emor

Posted on May 16, 2024 (5784) By Rabbi Yochanan Zweig | Series: Rabbi Zweig on the ParshaLevel: Intermediate Beginner

“When you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not remove completely the corners of your field as you reap and you shall not gather the gleanings of your harvest; for the poor and the proselyte shall you leave them…” (23:22)

 

The latter portion of this week’s Parsha deals extensively with the festivals. In the midst of the chapter of the festivals, the Torah introduces the laws concerning leaving crops for the poor. Rashi cites the Midrash that questions why these laws are repeated, having already been discussed in Parshas Kedoshim. Furthermore, why are these laws specifically repeated in the middle of the section regarding the festivals? The Midrash answers that since the festivals were a time when offerings were brought up to Yerushalayim by the Jewish people, the Torah is teaching that a person who leaves for the poor “leket” – grain which falls from the harvester and “shikecha” – grain which is forgotten by the harvester, and “pe’ah” – a corner of the field that is left for the poor, is considered to have built the Beis Hamikdash and offered Korbanos within it.1 Why are these particular gifts, leket, shikecha and pe’ah singled out from amongst the many forms of charity? Furthermore, what is the meaning of the comparison to the building of the Beis Hamikdash and the bringing of Korbanos?

 

The commentaries explain that when Hashem commanded us to build the Mishkan, He did not use the words “yitnu li” – “give to Me”, rather “yikchu li” – “take on My behalf” for we cannot give to Hashem; we acknowledge that the wealth we possess is really His, and therefore, we built the Mishkan with that which was His. 3 This concept holds true for Korbanos brought in the Beis Hamikdash as well. We do not “give” Korbanos to Hashem; rather, through the symbolic gesture of bringing a Korban, we acknowledge that what we have is really His.

 

Almost all forms of charity involve giving to a poor person. This action often provides the person giving with a feeling of magnanimity, and can skew his perception so that he feels he is giving that which belongs to him. Leket, shikecha and pe’ah are unique forms of charity in that the landowner does not give anything to the poor; he is forbidden to collect the produce involved, thereby preventing him from determining who will receive it. The landowner is commanded to leave the produce where it is and allow any needy person who wishes, to take it for himself. This procedure drives home the concept to the landowner that he does not control the wealth; rather, charity is merely the means by which Hashem distributes His wealth. When a person fulfills these mitzvos, which are the most difficult forms of charity for they preclude the feeling of satisfaction from having actually given, it is as if he built the Beis Hamikdash and offered Korbanos; the comparison is clear, for these actions also require a person to comprehend that he is merely the conduit through whom Hashem redistributes that which is His.

1.23:22


Coin Exchange

Parshas Emor

Posted on June 7, 2002 (5757) By Rabbi Dovid Green | Series: Dvar TorahLevel: Beginner

This week’s parsha contains many precepts which pertain to Aharon The Kohain (priest) and his descendants. He and his children merited to be the agents of the Jewish Nation in the sacred service performed in the Temple. As a result of this exalted status, being servants of the King in His palace, there are many extra stringencies which they, the Kohanim, are required to follow.

 

These can be found in the book of Leviticus (Chap. 21).

 

The first verse states “And G-d said to Moshe, say to the Kohanim, (the) sons of Aharon, and say to them, he shall not defile himself (through contact) with death among his people.” This means that a Kohain is required to avoid contact with a dead body, or even being under the same roof.

 

A Kohain does not attend a funeral except for a wife, mother, father, unmarried sister, brother, son, or daughter.

 

The unusual thing about this verse is the repetition of the words “say to the Kohanim,” and then again “you shall say to them.” Seemingly, once would have been sufficient. Rashi quotes the Talmud that the repetition should be interpreted as follows. “Say to them” the following:

 

“you (each Kohain) should say to them (your children) not to defile themselves etc.” This means to say that each Kohain is exhorted to teach his children to follow these special laws. The possessors of this information should be purveyors of it as well.

 

There is an important lesson to us all in these words. If parents wish their children to identify with Jewish ideals, they must be taught by example to follow the ideals. Secondly, Jewish ideals must occupy a significant place in children’s world view. In many places in North America, there are old Jewish communities which have all but died out. The ones which are still intact are the ones which established Jewish schools for their children to attend. The congregations, burial societies, and Jewish nationalistic and political organizations were not able to instill in Jewish youth the desire to maintain the level of observance or Jewish identity that so many Jews brought with them as immigrants to North America. Jewish education in a significant measure, with parents setting the example, is the only tried and true method of raising children who make Jewish identity a priority in their lives. There is a saying: “if there are no kids, where will the old goats come from?”

 

There is a story in “In the Footsteps of the Maggid,” by Rabbi Paysach Krohn, about a child who grew up years ago in Jerusalem. He was from a very poor family. One Shabbos (Sabbath) day he was out walking through the Jaffa Gate, in a section of the city densely populated by Arabs. He was on his way to the Western Wall when he happened upon a gold coin laying in the street. He dared not pick it up, as he would not handle money on Shabbos. He knew that the coin could be used to feed his hungry family for two weeks. He decided to just place his foot on top of the coin until Shabbos (the Sabbath) would end, and then he would take it. Needless to say, this was an amazing feat for a child of a young age. After standing there for over an hour, an Arab boy noticed him and questioned him as to why he was standing there like a statue. As the Arab boy insisted on hearing an answer, the Jewish child began to explain. Hearing that there was something under the boy’s foot, the Arab boy immediately pushed the boy aside, grabbed the coin, and ran. Feeling quite down, the boy returned to synagogue. The *Rabbi noticed that he was not his usual helpful self, and he came to the boy inviting him to participate in Seudah Shlishis, the third Sabbath meal. The child related the entire story to the Rabbi. He told the boy that he should join the others at the table for now, and that after Shabbos he should join him at his home. Later, at home, the Rabbi reached into his drawer, took out an identical coin, and said “this coin is yours on the condition that you will give me the eternal reward that you will receive for what you did this afternoon. Upon hearing this offer, and understanding the worth of the deed, he refused. He said “if that is what the deed is worth, then it’s not for sale.” The Rabbi bent over to the boy, and kissed him on his forehead. With great wisdom, the Rabbi taught this boy the value of a mitzva (commandment), and that lesson stayed with him for many years hence.

 

*The Chernobyler Rebbe, Rabbi Nachum Twersky (1840-1936).

Good Shabbos!

 

Saturday, May 11, 2024

 

A Critical Difference

Parshas Kedoshim

Posted on May 8, 2024 (5784) By Rabbi Naftali Reich | Series: Legacy | Level: Beginner

Why do we cringe when our flaws and shortcomings are pointed out to us? Why do we find criticism such a bitter pill to swallow? Logic would seem to dictate the exact opposite. We all want to be the very best we can possibly be, to reach our full potential. Therefore, it is important that we know our flaws in order to correct them, and we should be happy to have them pointed out to us. Why then do we cringe? Why do we feel humiliated?

 

Furthermore, the Torah in this week’s portion commands us, “Do not hate your brother in your heart. Rebuke your friend, and do not bear sin upon him.” There seems to be a contradiction here. On the one hand, the Torah requires us to rebuke others. Yet the Sages tell us that “people who accuse others of shortcomings are themselves guilty of the same flaws,” clearly implying that we should refrain from offering rebuke.

 

The answer lies in a closer reading of the Torah’s commandment. “Rebuke your friend.” Make sure your rebuke is delivered in a spirit of friendship. “Do not bear sin upon him.” Separate the person from the sin. Rebuke the deed, not the person. People who judge and condemn, the Sages add, are generally guilty of the very crimes of which they accuse others. People who are righteous and free of guilt, however, offer constructive criticism in a spirit of friendship.

 

Criticism itself does not humiliate. After all, very few people consider themselves absolutely perfect. Rather, it is the manner in which the criticism is delivered that humiliates. Very often, unfortunately, it is delivered in a mean-spirited, malicious manner, whereby the critic demeans us in order to make himself appear “holier than thou.” It is a put-down, and we instinctively recoil.

 

Constructive criticism, however, delivered in a pure spirit of love and compassion, is always welcome. Indeed, it is one of the primary catalysts of personal growth.

 

In a certain district of Jerusalem, all the storekeepers agreed to close down their stores for Shabbos – except for one grocer. No matter how much pressure was brought on him, he refused to budge.

 

One Friday, one of the prominent Jerusalem sages dressed in his best Shabbos finery and entered the grocery store. He stationed himself on a chair in the back of the store and proceeded to stay there for the entire day, watching the busy hustle and bustle of the grocery shoppers. As evening drew near, the grocer approached the sage and asked, “Is everything all right, rabbi? Do you need anything? Is there anything I can do to help you?”

 

“No,” said the sage. “I have come here because I wanted to understand why you refuse to close your store on Shabbos. Now, it is clear to me. You have such a busy store that it would be a tremendous ordeal for you to close it, even for one day.”

The grocer burst into tears. “You are the first one to try to see it from my side,” he managed to say between sobs. “Everyone scolded and berated me, but before you, no one tried to understand me.” After that day, it did not take long before the grocer agreed to close his store on Shabbos. A few kind words had been effective where threats and invective had failed.

 

In our own lives, we often fell a need to criticize others. Before we do so, however, we should ask ourselves: Are we doing it for their good rather than our own? Are our motives pure and compassionate? If the answer is yes, and if we deliver the criticism in a kind and gentle manner, it will undoubtedly be effective. The difference is critical.

 

Text Copyright © 2008 by Rabbi Naftali Reich and Torah.org.

 

Who Made Ears to Hear

Parshas Acharei Mos Kedoshim

Posted on April 26, 2018 (5778) By Rabbi Label Lam | Series: Dvar TorahLevel: Beginner

“You shall not be a gossipmonger among your people, you shall not stand aside while your brother’s blood is shed – I am HASHEM!” (Vayikra-19:16)

 

I am HASHEM! – I am guaranteed to reward and reliable to exact payment. – (Rashi)

He Who implants the ear, does He not hear? (Tehillim-94:9)

 

Why are these three ideas seated next to each other? 1) Don’t be a gossiper- 2) Don’t stand by your brother’s blood (save his life) – 3) I am HASHEM!  Why is this verse crowned with the words, “I am HASHEM!” It is a rather uncommon phenomenon. It would be fitting that every verse and every Commandment should be punctuated with this powerful reminder that HASHEM is guaranteed to give a reward for obedience and a payback for neglect. Why is it most appropriate here!?

 

I once asked one of my Rebbeim why the Torah expressed the requirement to save a life as a “negative” commandment. It could easily have stated the obligation emphatically to save-save another’s life. Why does it say not to stand by your brother’s blood? That implies that one should not remain passive when the opportunity arises to save someone’s life?! Why not say it as action “to do”?

 

He told me that there is a huge practical difference. According to Hallacha, a person is only required to spend up to 1/5 of his monies to perform a positive Mitzvah. In order not to be in violation of a “don’t do” a person is required to forfeit his entire fortune.

 

If the cost of buying Tzitzis would be too high based on my financials, then I can be considered exempt from the need to purchase them.

 

However, if my boss demands that I speak Loshon Hora or I will lose my job, well then I am obligated to accept the pink slip rather than utter or accept a disparaging word about a fellow Jew.

 

Similarly, if the Torah had obligated me to save my brother’s blood by giving $1000 then I might call my accountant first to see if it is within my budget to get involved in this sacred activity.

 

Since it is expressed as a “don’t” then I must be ready to do whatever it takes to save this person regardless of the price. It’s worth meditating on the extremely high value of not violating a single commandment, as well as the premium placed on saving a life!

 

Now the Talmud states that one who speaks Loshon Hora is considered like he killed three people- himself, the listener, and the one spoken about. It’s a triple murder suicide. One cannot stand idly by while this destruction is unfolding. It must be halted immediately and at all costs.

 

Holding back a juicy tidbit of gossip is an aspect of not standing by your brother’s blood.  The mind arrests the mouth and preemptively thwarts the crime.

 

Admittedly, it is hard, very hard, but as the Mishne in Pirke Avos says, “according to the difficulty so is the reward.” It’s no wonder the Chofetz Chaim quotes the Vilna Gaon who references a Midrash that makes the following amazing promise, “For each and every moment that a person seals his mouth he merits a hidden light that even no angel or creature is capable of estimating.” AWESOME!

 

Perhaps that’s why this verse and a few like it conclude with the phrase that pays, “I am HASHEM!”  If one fails to help his fellow when he had a chance, who could know whether or not he turned a blind eye and walked on by?! Only HASHEM! Also, when one is ever so tempted to launch a destructive word and with great inner strength, he puts the breaks on Loshon Hora and holds himself back, the sound of that word that was never spoken is inaudible – undetectable to the human ear. It’s the sound of one hand clapping.

 

The only One Who could know what was not said, and measure the weight of the difficulty factor in doing so is the One Who made mouths to speak and Who made ears to hear.