Saturday, July 25, 2020




They Can Assure a Cure

 

 

Posted on July 12, 2013 (5773) By Rabbi Label Lam | Series: Dvar Torah | Level: Beginner

While we are sitting low and feeling low on Tisha B’Av we might want to figure out how we got to this point. After all, that’s the refrain of Eicha- “How did it happen?”- echoing in our ears. How did it happen?

Our sages tell us that what brought about the destruction of the 2nd Temple was something called “Sinas Chinam” -baseless hatred! I can still recall the feeling of helplessness when I was yet a young Yeshiva student and ever since, sitting there on Tisha B”Av and not   knowing exactly what to feel guilty about. How to I find that hidden hatred and how do I practically uproot it? Where is the class on psychoanalysis or the workbook that comes   along with the diagnosis?

Well, now I have a new problem. The origins of Tisha B’Av do begin when the 1st of the     2nd Temple were destroyed. The first “Tisha B’Av” was when the spies in the dessert came back with a discouraging report the congregation “gave their voices crying and the nation cried on that night” (Bamidbar 14:1). The Talmud (Taanis 29) quotes Rabbi Yochonon,   “That night was Tisha B’Av. The Holy One, blessed is He said to them, “You are crying a cry for nothing (Bechia shel chinam- a baseless cry)? I will fix for you a crying for    generations!”” Now I have to figure out what a baseless cry is all about also!

Rabbi Matisyahu Solomon offers a blunt and sobering explanation of the phenomenon of “baseless hatred” which our sages tell us is the underlying reason for the destruction of the 2nd Temple and the length of the subsequent exile. Imagine a teacher is trying to gain the attention of a student in his class. The child is playing with some toy inside his desk and he is warned time and again. Eventually the teacher cuts off the arm of the student. The  parents and the principal are mortified. The teacher explains that he was playing with  things inside his desk during class time. Everyone would agree in this absurd case that the teacher stepped over all bounds of acceptability, no matter how he may try to explain his behavior. Sure the kid was not innocent but he didn’t deserve to lose a limb.

 

So says Rabbi Solomon that sometimes a person has a real claim against another. He was slighted or cheated or damaged in some way but that does not justify hating him in his entirety or frowning at and complaining about his family and wishing them ill. All that would be overkill. It requires a sophisticated and surgical approach not to condemn the whole of a person or his clan because a single albeit legitimate point of contention. That’s  the definition and the dynamic of the debilitating disease called “baseless hatred”. Not that  it is entirely unwarranted but that that the limited license to complain spills over and    floods the arena of the “unwarranted”.

Perhaps we can apply the same working definition and standard to help us to understand   the “baseless crying” -“bechia shel chinam” which was the real root of our downfall of Tisha B’Av. Sure the people felt justified in their crying because the news was disappointing as interpreted. However, the extra moaning and complaining, and the indulging in feelings of being defeated, and the accompanying anger and resentment in crying- is what spills over  for generations. Tears too need to be surgical so they can assure a cure!

DvarTorah, Copyright © 2007 by Rabbi Label Lam and Torah.org.



Saturday, July 18, 2020



One Nation Under G-d


Posted on July 15, 2020 (5780) By Rabbi Naftali Reich | Series: Legacy | Level: Beginner
This week’s Torah portion begins with Hashem’s command to “Oppress the Midianites and smite them”. We are instructed to exact justice for the way they cunningly enticed the  Jewish people to worship their idol, Peor, and seduced the Israelite nation into    promiscuity.
The Midianites’ scheme to defeat the Jewish people by dispatching their daughters to lure Jewish men into sinning succeeded in ensnaring thousands. Those Jews who succumbed were punished by a deadly plague. There is obvious justice in Hashem’s command to the Jewish nation to retaliate against the Midianites for their evil-minded plot. But the commentaries teach that the hostility toward Midian did not end with the desert battle.
The Jewish people were commanded to harbor enmity toward the Midianties for all future generations. Why? Why punish the offspring with lasting rejection?
Perhaps a closer look at the heartbreaking events that took place in Brooklyn 3 years ago this week, can provide insight into the roots of this command. The savage, degenerate attack on a defenseless Jewish child by another Jew must be probed for its searing commentary on features of our own community and lifestyle.

The incident appalled and horrified us. Our shared grief brought a renewed awareness of the depth of our solidarity with one another. We witnessed how all segments of the community rallied as soon as Leiby’s disappearance became public. It galvanized all segments of the community, as Jews (and local neighbors) of all stripes and backgrounds frantically searched for him. Now that the details of his brutal murder have surfaced, the public’s attention has turned to ensuring that the perpetrator is brought to justice.
Much of the focus has also been channeled towards preventing the recurrence of violent and tragic events of this nature; toward educating the public about safety guidelines to protect our children and communities from perverts and predators.
As observant Jews we understand that everything that transpires in life carries a deeper personal message to us, and it is important that we try to ascertain what positive aspects of growth we can harness from this dreadful episode. How can we decipher the hidden  message that lies beneath such a repulsive crime?
Our forebearers have taught us that we must examine our past to chart a pathway to our future, and thus our first frame of reference needs to be the Tanach itself. One finds a parallel to the depraved violence committed last week by one Jew against another in the story of Pilegesh B’giva, Shoftim chapter 19. A brief outline of the events surrounding this shocking narrative is in order.
The scriptures tell us how an unidentified Levite, who married a woman from  Bais   Lechem Yehuda, experienced marital strife with his concubine. She had abruptly left him   to return to her father’s home. With the aim of restoring family harmony, he went to his father in law’s home to induce her to return. Upon their journey home, they traveled through the tribe of Benjamin’s territory and sought overnight accommodations in the town of Givah. As they waited in the town square, they realized that no one was willing to provide them with lodging. They soon realized that the people of Givah were inhospitable and were callously ignoring them.
An elderly man saw their plight and with genuine warmth, welcomed them to his home, offering them a lavish feast and overnight accommodations. Before long, a mob descended on his home and what followed was eerily similar to the tragic events related in Parshas Vayeira when the malachim visited Lot in Sodom. The mob demanded that the guests be delivered into their hands so that they could get to know them and ‘sodomize’ them. The host, seeing how events were spiraling out of control, beseeched the rabble not to molest   his guests. Finally, in order to save their lives, they delivered the guest’s concubine to the wild crowd, who indulged their savage lust by violating her throughout the night.
In the morning, the woman lay dead at the door of her host. Her husband lifted her dead body onto his mule and took her home. Rather than bury her, he cut her up into twelve   parts and sent her limbs to the twelve tribes to alert them to the catastrophe that had taken place. The commentaries explain he wanted to shock people into an awareness of the cancerous malaise that had eaten into the fabric of the nation.
Although the Jewish people are comprised of twelve individual tribes, we are all one body beating with one heart and throbbing with one soul. Abhorrent behavior exhibited by one tribe highlights the spiritual stagnation and apathy that can disconnect the nation as a whole from their life source, Hashem.
The entire Jewish population, shaken to the core, rallied to this startling message. The verses go on to describe the tribe of Benjamin’s refusal to punish the perpetrators appropriately. To protest their passive tolerance of the unspeakable crimes committed, the tribes waged a civil war against the tribe of Benjamin, almost completely decimating it.
Only six hundred young men from Benjamin managed to miraculously flee the carnage of battle. With the aid of the entire Jewish people, the survivors rebuilt their tribe. They were assisted in their quest to remarry and rebuild their decimated population.
The newly formed and purified tribe of Benjamin was replanted and its rise to prominence was once again assured.
The harrowing story of Pilegesh BeGivah is difficult to read and comprehend. The episode happened shortly after the death of Joshua among a people that had just settled into their portion of the Holy land. How could the people of Givah have been so depraved and carnal? The verses give us a definitive answer. These people had absorbed the Sodomite philosophy of neighboring cultures that encouraged uninhibited gratification of one’s lusts without regard to others’ feelings and rights. Everything was rationalized in the name of “if I want     it, I deserve it; it’s my right and nothing else matters.”
This mindset had infiltrated the town of Givah, whose inhabitants should have been duly punished for their crimes, and the behavior they exhibited totally uprooted. But this did not happen. The horrific crimes committed against a helpless woman failed to trigger in  the tribe of Binyamin a level of public outrage that would testify to the moral fiber of the general population. In place of revulsion and fury, there was apathy, indifference. The failure to respond appropriately signaled that a malignant philosophy had taken root, one that threatened the entire Jewish people.
That moral rot had to be painfully expunged before its toxic effects could infect the nation.

Our generation too, faces a tsunami of Sodomite culture and philosophy. The child killer surely watched and absorbed the ubiquitous images flaunting violence and immorality that abound in the media and in movies. During questioning he freely admitted what prompted him to cruelly asphyxiate the victim. ‘I saw posters with my video image on them and I panicked”! He abandoned all rational thinking to protect his own skin and to secure his  petty self interest. Boundaries of decency and personal dignity have been crushed in the
headlong rush to license the expression of every carnal instinct. Narcissism and excessive self indulgence are chalked up to freedom of choice and individual lifestyle. The pursuit of my happiness has become the end goal itself.
Deep down, we cannot escape the reality that any individual’s act carries repercussions that affects us all. We are one people spiritually and organically bonded with one collective soul. When a noxious toxin infects one part of our body, it can soon threaten and poison the spiritual health of our nation as a whole. This was the message that the Levite in the   Pilegesh B’givah narrative imparted by dismembering his wife and dispatching her body parts to all the tribes.
It is a message that perhaps we would do well to ponder.

We are all aware of the dangerous predators and pedophiles that lurk in the shadows of our communities, waiting to prey upon innocent children. We take appropriate measures to protect ourselves, our families and our communities from their perilous reach. But we must also safeguard ourselves from an equally insidious danger posed by the Sodomite culture of our times: the steady bombardment in every media outlet of provocative images that excite our basest instincts.
The prevailing culture of permissiveness has sanctioned ‘alternative lifestyles’ to the point of embracing decadent behavior. We are fast losing our sense of revulsion towards moral degeneracy. We no longer have an acute sense of its corrosive effect on the kedusha and purity of the Jewish people.
In a spectacular display of achdus and unity, we shared the collective grief of Leiby’s abduction and brutal killing. We acted similar to the people in Biblical times who rallied as one man to the Benjamite border to determine what had happened. Now we too, like our forebearers, must ensure that such a display of animal savagery will never recur in our community. We too must now seek to implement the necessary steps to ensure that last week’s atrocity will never be repeated.
But while focusing on the practical side of such a campaign, we must also protect ourselves and our families from the invisible but toxic effects of the degenerate culture surrounding   us that surely contributed to it’shappening.’Tzror es hamidyanim vehikisem osem”-   retaliate and smite the Midianites, says the Torah, not for who they are but for what they represent!
As a consequence of our taking the necessary precautions to shield the purity of our minds and bodies, we too will surely be united as one nation under one G-d.
Wishing you a wonderful Shabbos

Rabbi Naftali Reich Text Copyright © 2014 by Rabbi Naftali Reich and Torah.org.

Saturday, July 11, 2020




Loyal Leadership • Torah.org

 

 

Posted on July 26, 2019 (5779) By Rabbi Shmuel Kamenetzky | Series: Drasha | Level:


At the end of Parshas Pinchos, Hashem told Moshe Rabbeinu about the forthcoming end of his life, and the passing of the leadership to the next generation. Moshe, concerned about the future of his people, asks a request, “Hashem should choose a leader who will go and come in front of them, (the Jewish Nation) and the congregation of Israel should not be   like a flock that does not have to them a shepherd.”

Seemingly, Moshe Rabbeinu uses a few extra words. Instead of simply saying that the Jews should not be like “a flock without a shepherd,” he adds the words “asher ein lahem roeh” that does not have to them a shepherd.” Why the extra words?

Rabbi Paysach Krohn, in his book, “Around the Maggid’s Table’ (Artscroll, 1989) tells the following story. At the outbreak of World War One, A young man came to the great Gaon and leader of European Jewery, Rav Chaim Ozer Grodzinsky for a blessing not to be inducted into the Russian army. The hazards of war were terrifying, and the army usually kept soldiers in their ranks for decades. After conversing with the teen for a bit, the Rav asked, “Do you wear tzitzis.” “No.” came the reply.

“Do your put on tefillin every day.” ““Do you observe the Shabbos.” The boy, looking down, embarrassed, and in a whisper he answered again, “No.”

Silence permeated the room and the boy stood in fear of what the holy tzaddik would tell him. Instead, after a few moments, Rav Grodzinksy looked up at him, and in a calming, loving voice, he said, “I bless you that the Soviet authorities should be just as disappointed in you as I am.”

Only a few weeks later, the boy came back to the Rav and told him, “ Rebbe, your bracha worked! I was rejected by the Soviet army!” He them lifted his shirt to show the Rav his tzitzis. Needless to say, he returned to the path of observance.

My grandfather, Rav Binyamin Kamenetzky zt”l would explain based upon a passage in the Sefer Kehilos Yitzchok. Rav Jacob Joseph, a great orator, was appointed as the maggid of  the city of Vilna in 1883, five years before coming to the United States to assume the  position of chief Rabbi of the city of New York. In his inaugural address, he answered the question as follows.

One who tends to his own sheep does not care about the sheep per se, rather he worries about his bottom line. His concern for an injured sheep would be more for his bottom line than for the welfare of is animal.

But one who is watching sheep for someone else, doesn’t care much about the bottom line. The sheep are not his, and he has no vested interest in them. His tending to the sheep is more idealistic, as he is concerned about the actual health and well-being of the sheep.

The same, explained Rav Joseph, is with leaders of people. There are many nations in the world – each one with a different leader. Some do their job well, but they ultimately care about their bottom line. The individual needs of the many citizens don’t concern that all that much – as long as their position is secure and they win the next election.

Moshe wasn’t worried that the Jews would be left without someone taking charge. He knew that there will be a leader. He wanted to ensure that the leader was a leader “of them.” The new leader had to take into account the plight of every single  Jew, each    personal situation, and every individual’s struggles and challenges. He wanted the leader

to celebrate with them and revel with joy in their accomplishments. Therefore, he implored Hashem, “Let the Jews not be like a flock that does not have to them a leader.” Moshe insisted that the leader be a leader “for them.”

Moshe, the ultimate leader of the Jewish Nation, knew to instill this important trait in the future of our leaders for generations to come.






Healing Wonders • Torah.org
 
 
Posted on July 12, 2012 (5772) By Rabbi Label Lam | Series: Dvar Torah | Level: Beginner
And behold! A man of the Children of Israel came and brought the Midianite woman near    to his brothers before the eyes of Moshe and before the entire assembly of the Children of Israel; and they were weeping at the entrance of the Tent of  Meeting.  Pinchas,  son  of Elazar son of Aaron the Kohen stood up from amid the assembly and he took a spear in his hand. He followed the Israelite man into the tent and pierced them both, the Israelite man and the woman into her stomach- and the plague was halted from upon the Children of Israel. Those who died in the plague were twenty-four thousand. HASHEM spoke to Moshe saying, “Pinchas son of Elazar son of Aaron the Kohen turned back My wrath from upon     the Children of Israel, when he zealously avenged My vengeance among them, so I did not consume the Children of Israel with My vengeance.” Therefore say, “Behold I am giving to him My covenant of peace! (Pinchus 25:6-13)
What did Pinchas do to make himself worthy of a “peace prize”? This was certainly not an act that had any overt gestures of what we would consider peaceful. Just the opposite is true! It was violent and cruel to the untutored eye. What’s the meaning of his heavenly award?
Let us approach this “crime scene” like forensic scientists and with benefit 20/20  hindsight, deconstruct the incident to discover what happened. I believe we may be   missing an important piece of peace! It’s a little bit of a dirty word in the world of relative values and where the only absolute is that there is no absolute, but it’s worth mentioning here because it may the most important part of the puzzle. That explosive word is “truth”- yes “TRUTH”! There I said it! Pinchas exposed a serious point of truth while all around confusion prevailed. Certain sacred boundaries were crossed and blurred. Nobody knew quite what to do about it! A plague was afoot. The congregation was consumed in a cloud   of chaos. Pinchas surgically exposed that truth – no puns intended- he lanced the boil and peace triumphed. Rabbi Samson, Raphael Hirsch ztl. wrote that peace is a descendant of truth and not the other way around. That might just be the hidden factor of peace-the obvious truth- the pink elephant in the middle of the room that nobody wants to talk about!
There’s a story about a Baal Teshuvah- a returnee to Torah life who was living in Israel. He had accepted upon himself the full and complete lifestyle and was experiencing the fullness of community life. He had one issue though. He wanted badly to go gain the extra purity associated with going to a Mikvah like many others and yet he was prevented from doing    so, not by anyone else but rather by himself. You see, he had a tattoo on his arm, but not   just a tattoo but a nasty image. It didn’t say “MOM”. So he was ultra-concerned that    nobody should find out about this ugly reminder of his past. Looking at him nobody would  or could ever suspect that he bore this grotesque image on his arm.
As Rosh HaShana approached wanted badly to visit the Mikvah and so he began to strategize and scout out how it might safely be done without his secret becoming exposed. He figured out the optimal time when the Mikvah would be least crowded and how he would be able walk along a wall from the shower to the pool with a towel and walk back albeit awkwardly but with no one being the wiser.
The great day came and the room was a little busier than he planned and so he nervously hurried along a little faster than he should have given the amount of soap and water on the floor. Then his feet when flying and his towel too that covered as his arm because he   needed that hand to break his fall. The busy and bustling room was stricken silent. In that sudden quiet he understood that his darkest secret was exposed and there was no way to  put the genie back in the bottle.
He was humiliated beyond belief. Nothing anyone could say or do could possibly remedy his pathetic situation. Then hobbling along came an elderly Jew who while helping him gently off the floor pointed to the numbers etched on his arm and declared empathically, “This was my gehinom (hell)! Most probably that was your gehinom! Let us go into the Mikvah together!
We see that when even the most brutal truth is shockingly revealed, peace can begin to work its healing wonders.
 
DvarTorah, Copyright © 2007 by Rabbi Label Lam and Torah.org.

 


Truly Humane • Torah.org
 
 
Posted on July 1, 2010 (5770) By Rabbi Label Lam | Series: Dvar Torah | Level: Beginner
HASHEM spoke to Moshe, saying: Pinchus son of Elazar, son of Aaron the Kohen turned back My wrath from upon the Children of Israel, when he zealously avenged Me among them, so I did not consume the Children of Israel in My vengeance. Therefore say: ‘Behold!   I give him My covenant of peace. And it shall be for him and his offspring after him a covenant of eternal priesthood, because he took vengeance for his G-d and he atoned for    the Children of Israel. The name of the slain Israelite man who was slain with the Midianitess was Zimri son of Salu, leader of a father’s house of the Simeonites. (Bamidbar 25:10-14)
Rabbi Tanchuma says, “Whenever three righteous individuals stand-up, son after son, for three consecutive generations, a covenant is established with them that they will never cease to be and so we find by Avraham, Yitzchok, and Yaakov… (Midrash Agada)
The Midrash must have noticed something curious. Three generations are mentioned in association with Pinchus when crowning him with credit and a perpetual promise of peace for his descendants forever. Wow! However, when the perpetrator of the dastardly deed is mentioned it’s only him and his father: no further back and certainly no way forward. Why is that so?
I was at a Bris in Jerusalem many years ago and Rosh HaYeshiva stood up to offer his Torah blessings. Amongst the assembled that day and sitting at the head table was a colleague, a Talmud Scholar, who happened to be the grandfather of the infant who was attending the Bris of his very first grandchild. The Rosh HaYeshiva started his speech by praising him, “Today he is a human being!” People were a little shocked. That’s all?! A human being!? That’s the best he could say!? He then went on to explain to everyone’s satisfaction.
Ubiquitous in the animal kingdom we find that a mother or father of the species has a zealous concern for the welfare of its offspring. You don’t want to get between a mother
bear and her cubs! Caution is advised when approaching a nest of eggs or young chicks. Who knows what a mother bird wouldn’t do to protect her brood.
However, nowhere do we find except amongst humans that there is any fealty or sense of connectedness to grandchildren and from grandchildren to grandparents except in the human realm. Why is that phenomena so?
Perhaps because even in the individual behavior of humans we can take note that when the animal aspect, the nefesh behamios, is under control there is little thought of past or future. All that exists is the pulse of present passions and an overpowering current instinct for whatever has caught the attention of the beast.
However, when the G-dly soul is dominant, when the rider is firmly under control of his horse, then he is capable of visualizing more perfectly- from whence he comes and to where he goes. The more he is governing the more he can transcend the physical and perceive himself as an actor in a grand historical context. He can appreciate the contributions of generations past and act now on behalf of future and unseen progeny. Clearly Pinchus is praised and gifted with perpetuity for having had that kind of clarity while Zimri who was enveloped in animalism is only worthy being mentioned in father-son mere biological   terms.
A somewhat elderly woman who has one child that intermarried and a another that   became a Baal Teshuvah and built a beautiful Jewish Mishpacha once confided in me that she came to understand why it is that she feels so much less for her non-Jewish grandchildren while feeling so much for her Jewish Grandchildren. Initially, she had suspected it was some built-in prejudice but later she came to comprehend that, as she expressed it, “When I look at my Jewish grandchildren I see the whole past and the whole future.
Maybe that’s what the Mishne in the 3rd Perek of Pirke’ Avos means, “Look at three things and you will not come into the grip of sin, “From where are you coming? To where are you going? In front of Whom are you in the future to give a judgment and an accounting?”
In that sense it could be said that Pinchus was truly humane!
DvarTorah, Copyright © 2007 by Rabbi Label Lam and Torah.org.
 




Saturday, July 4, 2020




Preemptive Passion

 

 

Posted on July 2, 2020 (5780) By Mordechai Dixler | Series: Lifeline | Level:

 


In this week’s reading, we learn of Bilaam, the non-Jewish prophet who was called to come curse the Jews.

Once given the opportunity, Bilaam saddled his own donkey at the break of dawn. This was totally out of character for an honored and wealthy man. He was so excited by the opportunity to cast a curse on the Jewish people that he dismissed all protocol, and didn’t wait for his servants to prepare his donkey for the journey.

The Midrash notes the similarity between Bilaam’s alacrity to embark on his mission, and Abraham’s similarly hurried actions hundreds of years before. When Abraham was called upon to sacrifice his son Isaac, an incredibly challenging test of faith, he, too, awoke at   dawn to saddle his own donkey and prepare for the journey. The Midrash concludes with G-d dismissively saying to Bilaam, “Evil one! Their father Abraham already preceded you!”

The reproach of this Midrash is puzzling. What connection is there between Abraham’s excitement to fulfill G-d’s command, and Bilaam’s excitement to curse the Jewish people? Why would Bilaam be taken aback when told of Abraham’s actions many years prior?

 

 

There is a story told of Rabbi Yisrael Lipkin zt”l, also known as R’ Yisrael Salanter, (1809- 1883) a famed Torah scholar and father of the Mussar Movement in the Lithuanian Yeshivos. Mussar is a program of intense study and exercise focused on ethical behavior  and character development. A shoemaker, was working late into the night, by the light of a candle, when Rabbi Lipkin passed his shop and took notice. After entering the shop, he asked the shoemaker why he was still working so late at night. The shoemaker replied, “As long as the candle still burns, there’s more work to do.”

Rabbi Lipkin left the shop and mulled over the words of the shoemaker – “As long as the candle still burns, there’s more work to do.” “The human soul is compared to a burning lamp (Proverbs 20:27),” he thought, “And as long as my soul burns within my body, I still have work to do.” He took the shoemaker’s words to heart for his own spiritual growth.

True devotion and growth in a spiritual path can be measured against the diligence people have for similar, non-spiritual causes. If Abraham had not preempted Bilaam with his own excitement to fulfill G-d’s will, Bilaam could have, G-d forbid, succeeded in his mission to curse the Jewish nation. Bilaam’s passion for the negative demanded a similar passion for the positive to balance it out. The excited readiness of Abraham to follow G-d’s command drained all the energy from Bilaam’s vendetta. (Based on Derash Moshe, HaRav Moshe Feinstein zt”l)

The challenge in spiritual improvement is to make it real. To get a sense of what “real” looks like, we can see how we react to the everyday, non-spiritual demands. With that we can gauge the energy and devotion we need in our spiritual pursuits. May we be so inspired, and grow in our relationship and devotion to Torah and G-d centered living!




Remember Balak’s Role

 

 

Posted on July 7, 2011 (5771) By Rabbi Berel Wein | Series: Rabbi Wein | Level:

Beginner Although Bilaam is the major villain of the piece in this week’s parsha, we should not overlook Balak’s nefarious role in the events described therein. Balak is the instigator of the whole plot to curse and destroy the Jewish people. He finances Bilaam and is most   persistent in pursuing his evil goal. Even when Bilaam apparently despairs of the success of his mission and so informs Balak,

Balak nevertheless insists that he continue, for perhaps he will yet be able to curse the people of Israel. Often in Jewish history we find this scenario repeated, with those behind the scenes persistently encouraging the masses to destroy the Jews while they stay a pious distance behind, causing, but somehow apparently not participating in, the murderous mayhem.

As hate filled as Bilaam is he cannot operate alone. He needs financial and social backing for him to do his worst. Bilaam is eventually killed by the very people he attempted to destroy. But Balak always lives on to try again to accomplish the destruction of the Jewish nation. Balak never makes peace with the idea that the Lord does not allow him his goal. His tenacity for hatred and evil behavior is his true hallmark of his identity.

Centuries later the prophet reminds us of Balak’s scheme and advice to Bilaam and warns   us somehow not to overlook Balak’s role in this story of aggression and unreasoned hatred. Through remembering the original Balak, the prophet informs us that we will be better    able to identify and deal with his successors in deceit and hatred throughout the ages.

It is not the suicide bomber – Bilaam – that is the only guilty party in terrorist attacks. It is the Balaks who send them and support them that are certainly equally as guilty. The pious human rights organizations that promote only hatred and violence under the guise of doing good deeds are also responsible for the loss of the precious lives of innocents caused by those whom they so nurture and support.

The Talmud stated this reality by coining the famous Jewish aphorism: “It is not the mouse alone that is the thief. It is rather the hole in the wall that allows the mouse entry into the house that is the real thief.” It is the persistence of those that are determined to undermine the Jewish people and the State of Israel that places them as direct immoral descendants

of Balak.

 

In the Pesach Hagadah we read that in every generation we face this challenge. No matter how many Bilaams we are able to dispose of, Balak somehow survives to continue to try again. The words of the prophet in this week’s haftorah – to remember Balak’s role in the story of the Jewish people in the desert of Sinai are addressed to us and our times as well.

We should not be shocked, though our sadness over this fact is understandable, that the malice against Jews of the 1930’s can repeat itself in today. As long as Balak still remains a force in the world the Jewish problem will not go away.

Shabat shalom, Rabbi Berel Wein

 

 

Rabbi Berel Wein- Jewish historian, author and international lecturer offers a complete selection of CDs,

audio tapes, video tapes, DVDs, and books on Jewish history at www.rabbiwein.com