Playing
With Fire
Parshas Shemini
Posted on April 2, 2024 (5784) By Rabbi
Mordechai Kamenetzky | Series: Drasha| Level: Beginner
It was the best of times.
It was the worst of times. The Mishkan (tabernacle)
was finally completed, and the celebration had begun. Ahron the High Priest and
his children brought special offerings, and the joy of accomplishment permeated
the camp of the Jewish Nation.
Then tragedy stuck.
Ahron’s two sons, Nadav and Avihu, brought an offering that the Torah
characterizes as “an alien fire that Hashem had
not commanded. A fire went out from before Hashem and
consumed them, and they died before Hashem.”
(Leviticus 10:1-3)
Varying Talmudic and
Medrashic opinions argue as to what exact sin they committed. Some commentaries
interpret the literal verse by explaining that Ahron’s children rendered a
Halachic (Biblical law) decision in front of their master, Moshe. Others say that they performed their
service after drinking wine. Still others argue that their true punishment was
deserved at Sinai.
They refused to marry
claiming that their lineage was so dignified that no maiden could ever meet
their standard. Another interpretation is that they began to discuss their
future leadership roles that they would secure after the two old men (Moshe and Ahron) passed on.
In all these varying
opinions a major question must be addressed. If those were their actual sins,
why then did the Torah use the terminology “a strange fire that Hashem had not commanded” to describe
their transgression? Obviously, those words are fit to describe each
interpretation that is offered. How?
The Dubno Magid would often
relate the following parable: After receiving his promotion to captain, a young
sergeant was given his new uniform. He was strictly warned by his appointing
general.
“Officer, this uniform is your
badge of honor. Wear it with pride, and never remove it in public!
Remember, you represent the
king’s elite forces, and your life is now devoted to enhance the honor of his
kingdom.”
Not long after his
commission some seamen in a public park chided the young officer. “We hear you
have a large tattoo across your chest reading “I miss my Mom.” The young
officer was enraged at this humiliating claim, and disputed it vehemently. He
was tempted to strip to the waist, but remembered the stern warning not to
remove his coat. Suddenly one of the sailors declared, “we will contribute 500
golden pieces to the King’s treasury if you don’t have the tattoo — but only if
you prove it now!”
In a patriotic move that
the sergeant felt would surely bring pleasure to the commander-in-chief, he
bared his chest, proved his point and collected the 500 gold coins. He ran to
the general with the money and expected a commendation. Unfortunately, a shower
of abuse greeted the neophyte officer. “You fool! I just lost a fortune because
of your stupidity. I bet the Navy admiral 2,500 gold pieces that not one of my
soldiers would ever remove their uniforms publicly! ”
Perhaps there is a common
thread among all the explanations of the sins of Nadav and Avihu.
In all of the opinions,
they had the best of intentions but their actions lacked protocol and guidance.
Actions without protocol can have disastrous results. Nadav and Avihu were
considered very holy and pious. But the small degree of over-confidence led to
their acting without consort. It led to their demise. Perhaps they felt
that they were in a position to render judgment without Moshe, or
that a little wine may have enhanced their service. Maybe they felt that
marriage was beneath them. In theory they may have been correct. But they made
decisions without consultation, advice, or consent. They were looking forward
to their own leadership — a leadership that never materialized. They had the
desire to contribute their own fire, according to their own visions, but the
Torah considered it alien.
The Mishkan was
given to the Jews to atone for the sin of the Golden Calf. It was at the Golden
Calf where the young nation rushed to judgment without true guidance. As soon
as Hashem felt that the self-directed scenario was
about to recur in the Mishkan, He made a powerful
statement. It was as if the Mishkan had a nuclear charge. When dealing with
high levels of radioactivity, one cannot forego the slightest established
protocol. If you experiment with fire, especially an alien fire, unfortunately
you get burnt.
Good Shabbos!
Moshe’s
Premonition That “Something Like This” Was Going to Happen
Parshas Shemini
Posted on April 4, 2024 (5784) By Rabbi
Yissocher Frand | Series: Lifeline | Level: Intermediate Beginner
These divrei Torah were adapted
from the hashkafa portion of Rabbi Yissocher Frand’s Commuter Chavrusah Tapes
on the weekly portion: #1332 – Dunking Your Doughnuts in Coffee – Must You Wash
Netilas Yadayim?
Good Shabbos!
Parshas Shemini contains the tragic event of the sudden
death of Aharon’s two eldest sons, Nadav and Avihu. Chazal note on the opening words of the parsha (“Vayehi b’yom hashemini“)
that the term “Vayehi” connotes pain. In this
context, tragedy struck on the eighth day (which coincided with Rosh Chodesh Nissan), following the shivas yimay hamiluim (seven days of inauguration)
of the Mishkan, during which Moshe served as the Kohen.
Just as Aharon was taking over
the job as Kohen Gadoland his sons were taking over the jobs of
serving as the Kohanimin the Mishkan, Nadav and Avihu
brought an “eish zarah” (foreign fire) and were struck down right
then and there. Whenever I read this parsha I
think to myself, imagine if there was a Chanukas Habayis of
aBais Haknesses (dedication ceremony for a new
shul).
Everyone is dancing. It is
a beautiful moment in time, and then suddenly a beam from the roof collapses
and hits someone on the head and kills him on the spot. It would be an untold
tragedy. People would never look at that shul the same. How much more so in
this case.
Aharon’s two eldest sons
die, righteous leaders of Israel, right there in the Mishkan! It must have had a horrible effect.
The pasuk says: “Moshe
said to Aharon: Of this did Hashem speak,
saying: ‘I will be sanctified through those who are nearest Me, thus I will be
honored before the entire people; and Aharon was silent.” (Vayikra 10:3). Rashi writes: “Aharon my brother, I knew that
this House would be sanctified through those who were closest to the Omnipresent.
I figured it would be through either me or you. Now I see that they (Nadav and
Avihu) were greater than me or you.”
This is a very powerful,
yet enigmatic statement by Rashi. “I knew that this had
to happen.” What does that mean? Can it mean that a tragedy needed to happen? Why would a tragedy need to
happen upon the inauguration of the Mishkan? We never consider such a possibility when we plan
a Chanukas Habayis!
The Dubno Maggid in his
Ohel Yakov gives a beautiful parable explaining what it means when Moshe said “I knew that this was going to
happen.” As is his style, the Dubno Maggid asks “Mashal l’mah ha’davar domeh”
(To what can this matter be compared)?
Imagine that a country
wanted to build a capital city to be the most beautiful city in the world.
They hired the greatest
architects and the most professional builders in the world. (When Washington
D.C. was being designed, the fledgling American Government brought in Pierre
Charles L’Enfant, a French army engineer who fought in the Revolutionary War,
to build the most beautiful capital city imaginable. Washington D.C. is indeed
a beautiful place.) So, they build in the finest of everything, the finest
materials, the finest architects, etc., etc., etc.
Of course, being a
world-class city, as they envision, they want to also build there for
themselves a world class hospital, the greatest hospital the world has ever
seen. Again, it would have the latest technology, the best staff, the best
equipment, all the ‘hidurim‘. And of course, it would need
to have the greatest doctor in the world. Since this is the capital city, the
city that is going to put all other cities in the world to shame, and since
this is going to be the hospital that is the most world-renowned medical
center, it needs to have at its head the greatest doctor to walk the face of
the earth.
And so it was. On the day
they cut the ribbon to go into the city, everything opened as planned. People
were overwhelmed by the beauty. One fellow started not feeling well on this
first day of the inauguration of the city. He complained of a headache. He went
into the hospital and became the first patient in the hospital. Of course, the
head of the hospital, this world-renowned doctor treated him personally. (It is
just a headache. “Take two aspirin and call me in the morning.”) A few days
later, the person died. He died in the best hospital in the world, in the
greatest city in the world, under the care of the best doctor in the world,
from a headache yet! What happened? How did this go wrong?
The Board of the Hospital
gets together to analyze what happened. It is so embarrassing. The mayor comes
to join in the investigation. The head doctor gets up and says “The fact
that this person died is the most fortunate thing that could have happened to
this city.” He explained: If we have the greatest city in the world, the most
pleasant city to live in, and we have the best hospital in the world, everyone
will say “I don’t need to take care of myself. I can eat without caring about
my weight gain. I don’t need to watch my cholesterol. I don’t need to monitor
my blood pressure. I don’t need to exercise. I have no worries about my health
because I live in the city with the best hospital in the world. If I get sick,
I will go to the hospital and be treated by the best doctor in the world and
everything will be fine.”
The doctor said that this
is why it was important, and even helpful, that the first patient in the
hospital died. This lets people know that such calculations are incorrect.
Someone can have the most beautiful city, the greatest technology, the greatest
hospital with the greatest equipment and the greatest doctor, but you still
need to take care of yourself.