A Matter of Opinion
Parshas
Acharei
Mos
The two festivals of
Pesach and Shavuos come in such rapid succession they almost seem like one
extended celebration. Indeed, some commentators compare the intervening days
between Pesach and Shavuos, when we count down to the Omer, to Chol Hamoed, the
Intermediate Days of the Festivals. By rights, this should be one long period
of uninterrupted festivity – but it is not.
The days of Sefiras Haomer, the Countdown to the Omer, are also days
of mourning and sadness. We mourn a catastrophe that befell the Jewish people
in Talmudic times, shortly after the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem.
The Talmud (Yevamos 62) tells us that a plague broke out among the disciples of
Rabbi Akiva during the period between Pesach and Shavuos, killing twenty-four
thousand of them.
This was indeed a terrible tragedy, but an annual memorial is
nevertheless somewhat puzzling. Unfortunately, Jewish history is a long
succession of terrible tragedies that blankets the entire calendar, and if we
were to observe annual mourning for them all, we would never cease to mourn.
Our Sages, therefore, selected only the most disastrous calamities for annual
commemoration. Why then does this plague rank among the most disastrous
calamities ever to befall the Jewish people?
Furthermore,
let us consider the cause of the plague. According to the Talmud, it happened
because “they did not have sufficient respect for one another.” Two problems
immediately come to mind.
First,
why would an infringement on the respect of their fellow disciples precipitate
such dire consequences?
Second,
why indeed did they fail to respect each other sufficiently? Rabbi Akiva was
one of the foremost proponents of ve’ahavta lereiacha kamocha, loving one’s
fellow as oneself; he considered it one of the fundamental concepts of the
Torah. Surely then, he would have stressed this idea to his disciples,
impressing on them the importance of treating other people with absolute
respect. After hearing such words from the holy lips of Rabbi Akiva, how could
twenty-four thousand of his disciples even consider being disrespectful to one
another?
The
commentators explain that Rabbi Akiva’s disciples were certainly people of
sterling character who would never have dreamed of uttering a single rude word
to another person. Rather, their “disrespect” manifested itself in the
intellectual sense.
The Talmud tells us that just as no two people are exactly identical
in their appearance, they are also not identical in their outlook and opinions.
Every person has his own particular way of looking at things, and no one else
in the world has exactly the same perspective. When Rabbi Akiva taught his
disciples, each one absorbed the teachings according to the nuances of his
particular perspective. This was, of course, as was to be expected. But how did
they view the opinions of their colleagues?
This is where the “disrespect” came into play. They could not
acknowledge the possibility that other people’s perspectives might also have validity.
Each one considered their own opinion the absolute truth and the opinions of
his colleagues as erroneous. This attitude reflected a lack of objectivity and
intellectual honesty. They were so enamored of their own wisdom that they could
not see the wisdom of others and respect their opinions. The transmission of
the truth of the Torah to future generations, however, required intellectual
purity and integrity, and these disciples were found lacking in that respect.
Therefore, in order to prevent the chain of transmission from being compromised,
these disciples perished in a plague.
And we mourn. We mourn the loss of twenty-four thousand great Torah
scholars. But even more, we mourn the riches of Torah knowledge and insight we
could have gained from an additional twenty four thousand conduits of Torah,
with all the textures and nuances of their varied perspectives – if only they
had been worthy. How these disciples could have made the Torah blossom before
our eyes – if only they had been able to achieve perfect objectivity. But they
did not, and our loss is irreplaceable.
In our own lives, we sometimes become so wrapped
up in our own point of view that we fail to acknowledge the possibility that an
opposing point of view may also have validity. There is an element of egotism
and conceit behind such an attitude. We love ourselves, and therefore we must
be right. But if we find it in ourselves to love our fellow as we do ourselves,
we will suddenly see the world with a new and profound clarity. Things that
bothered us will no longer do so. Things we did not appreciate will take on new
value and importance. And more likely than not, we will discover we have gained
much wisdom and peace of mind.
Text Copyright © 2011 by Rabbi Naftali Reich and Torah.org.
Rabbi Reich is on the faculty of the Ohr Somayach
Tanenbaum Education Center.