![]() |
Moshe: The Perfect Leader
Moshe is absent
from the people
of Israel for
forty days. This
seems to trigger
a disastrous turn of events that
results in the incident of the Golden
Calf. Why is Moshe’s absence
such a cataclysmic event in the evolving story of the constant and continuing backtracking of Israel from its Sinai
commitment? After all, every rabbi
is entitled to a vacation
away from his flock.
The commentators to Torah over
the centuries have
long debated the issue of the absence of Moshe and its connection to the sin of the Golden Calf.
Many saw it as a sign of immaturity on the part
of the people, in thinking that Moshe was their security
blanket and that they
could not serve
G-d without his help and intervention. Others
interpreted Moshe’s absence as a separation trauma in which
Israel believed that
Moshe, after being
in Heaven once already, so to speak,
could not readjust
to earthly existence and would perhaps
never return.
This would have
signaled to the people that
Torah and G-d’s
commandments were heavenly,
other-world issues that
could have no daily relevance to their mortal
existence upon earth. This
is an idea that the Torah itself
has to constantly counteract – that the Torah
is not in Heaven
and it is not for
Heaven. It is for humans
and intended to direct us in our earthly existence. The rabbis
taught us in the Talmud
that the Torah
was not given
to celestial angels. It was given
to fragile, vulnerable, sinful human beings.
Moshe
is not blamed for his absence. After
all, he followed
G-d’s commandment to remain
on the summit of Mount
Sinai after the granting of the Torah
to Israel. He certainly cannot be faulted for obeying the commands of the Lord. Yet his
absence seems to be a contributing factor in the grievous
sin of the Golden I think that Moshe’s absence, which after all was occasioned by a command
from G-d, was not really the main problem that troubled the Jewish people. Rather, it was the choice of Aharon and Chur
to replace him
that proved troubling, as events later
proved. Chur was
too strong a person and, in his confrontation with the people,
was killed. Aharon
was too accommodating and compassionate a person and
in his goodness and identification with the people and their demands
he contributed to the sin of the Golden Calf.
Moshe was the perfect
blend of strength
and compassion. The rabbis criticized King Saul for being too strong on one occasion and too weak
and compromising in another situation. A leader must encompass within one’s personality both strength and compassion, firmness and the ability to compromise. The greatness of a leader
is determined by the ability
to be firm when
necessary and accommodating when that occasion arises.
Moshe was and is the prime
example of such leadership qualities. He fights a civil war against the architects of the Golden
Calf and at the same
time pleads the case for forgiveness of the Jewish people from G-d. It is the absence of such a perfectly balanced personality, which
can destroy the
leader of a people.
Shabat shalom Rabbi Berel Wein

audio tapes, video tapes, DVDs, and books on Jewish history at www.rabbiwein.com
![]() |
You Have the Power • Torah.org
This week’s parsha contains the one of the more infamous moments in Jewish history, the sin of the Golden Calf.
The calamitous construction of this molten
image at the foot of Mount Sinai occurred
not six weeks
after the thunderous display of the giving of the Ten Commandments. Moshe, witnessing the
revelry surrounding the
calf while descending the Mount, threw down
the two tablets
containing the Ten Commandments, smashing
them to rubble. After
beseeching G-d for their forgiveness, Moshe prepared to return to the top of
Mount Sinai for a new
set of tablets. But unlike
the original pair,
which not only
had the text etched by G-d Himself but had also
been carved by G-d Himself, the new set which G-d would inscribe was to be hewn by Moshe. “G-d
said to Moshe,
‘Carve for yourself
two stone tablets like
the first ones,
and I shall inscribe on the tablets
the words which
were on the first tablets which you shattered.'” (Shemos/Exodus 34:1) Why did the second set
need to be formed by Moshe
rather than G-d?
Rabbi Moshe Feinstein (1895-1986; Rosh Yeshiva/Dean of Mesivtha Tifereth Jerusalem in New York City; the leading Halachic/Jewish legal decisor and foremost leader of Jewry of his time) explains that reason is found in the rationale behind the sin
of the Golden
Calf itself. The Golden Calf did not start as an idolatrous exercise. The Jewish People miscalculated Moshe’s return
date and understood his delay as a sign
that he had
died. They knew
that the Ten Commandments were
exclusively divine in their construction and interpreted this to mean that mere
mortals could not fully comprehend these commandments in all their depth. They knew that they needed assistance from celestial sources.
Had Moshe been alive,
they
reasoned, he would
entreaty these forces
to assist them.
But with his
feared demise, they needed
an alternative approach. Knowing the heavenly
nature of the image of an ox (indeed, one of the images seen by
Yechezkel/Ezekiel in his vision of the Divine Chariot (1:10)), they
chose to create
a likeness of an ox to which
they could appeal
for celestial assistance in spiritual growth.
Through these means
they believed they
would connect with G-d and understand His holy Torah.
But the maxim
they did not
appreciate was that
Torah is accessible to all and
we all have
the ability to reach
the highest spiritual plains to gain
a profound understanding of Torah. Thus, concludes Rabbi Feinstein, Moshe
was instructed to sculpt the second set of tablets,
to serve as an eternal
reminder that Moshe,
a man of flesh and blood, was a part of their construction, and, as such,
all people have
the ability to access the
heavenly help needed
for spiritual achievement and acquisition of Torah wisdom.
Have
a good Shabbos!
![]() |

![]() |
No comments:
Post a Comment