Saturday, May 19, 2018


That Golden Peace Treaty

Parshas Bamidbar


Posted on May 18, 2018 (5778) By Rabbi Label Lam | Series: Dvar Torah | Level: Beginner

That Golden Peace Treaty

Rabbi Elazar said: All agree with regard to Atzeret-Shavuot, that we require that it be also “for you,” meaning that it is a Mitzvah to eat, drink, and rejoice on that day. What is the reason? (Pesachim 68B)

On the Holidays, how is our time to be spent? There is a dispute! One opinion says that it is to be entirely spiritually or entirely material (eating and rejoicing) but not both. The other side says that the day is meant to be divided. When it comes to Shevuos everyone agrees that it should be divided between devotion to HASHEM and eating and rejoicing? Why is the holiday of Shevuos different?

To answer a question “why”, we need to see a thing in context. One of the most amazing things about being a human is that we are comprised of two completely different, disparate elements- whose needs seem almost irreconcilable. The SOUL and the BODY-are an “odd couple” indeed. While the BODY, like a horse, wishes to run on its horizontal plain in search of food and phillies, the SOUL, like a rider, is much more interested in climbing vertically in pursuit of truth and philosophy. How do we deal with this built in human dilemma? Whose needs dominate over the other’s needs? There are four classic approaches.

1-What we’ll call the far eastern way is an ideal that the soulful portion dominates the physical body. The successful practitioner finds him-self atop a mountain-aloof. His physical needs have been thoroughly quieted. He feels almost no pain. He can sleep on a bed of nails and fast. He is divorced from his body. Having trained himself to not to hear the whimpers of his own physical being or the temporal world around him, he meditates in that state and transcends the mundane.

2-The second we can refer to as the far western approach. Here the immediate needs of the body drown out the voice of the soul until it is a frail and thin voice, an afterthought called conscience. With plenty of continued practice that voice can be almost entirely annihilated.

It is recorded how the Nazis were sick to their stomachs the first time they carried out the brutal murder of Jews but after a while they could go home and eat dinner as if nothing had happened. The callous that develops with deeds that violate the sensibilities of the human soul grows thicker and darker with each repeated action. Eventually the body is divorced from its soul- Kores- cut off.

3- A third possibility encourages both spiritual and material indulgence but alternately. This “solution” is not a solution. In fact it complicates the human experience. The Talmud says pithily, “Oy li M’yotzri, Oy li’ M’yitzri”- “Woe to me from my Creator (or) Woe to me from my desire!” (Brochos 61A) Either the conscience will ache when violated or the body when deprived. A professor Meier was able to induce neurosis in rats. How? One door offered a food prize and the other a shock. Once the rat figured out which was which, the psychologist switched them. Now the rat crept cautiously from door to door uncertain whether it would receive a delight or an electric shock. At some point the rat parks himself equidistant from both doors and chooses to starve to death rather than risk getting a shock. OY! It’s not easy being a laboratory rat or a person that swings easily and too often from top of the spiritual spectrum into the abyss and back again.

4-The 4th- the middle-east emphasizes the spiritual but without negation of the physical. A fellow asked his friend, “Why are you busy caring for your horse all day?” He answered, “He’s a dumb horse and I’m a smart person. He needs me!” His friend then replied, “If he’s so dumb and you’re so smart, why don’t you get him to do things for you!?” If the soul can learn somehow to discipline the body in a sensitive and caring way, then a peace plan can be brokered between these two giant and competing forces. A person can happily navigate between the temporal on the way to the eternal in a joyous way. King Solomon had said about the Torah, “Its ways are ways of pleasantness and all its paths are peace.” (Mishlei 3:17) So we eat cheesecake and learn Torah too on Shevuos, to honor and reaffirm that golden peace treaty.



 
Chaos in the Desert
Parshas Bamidbar
Posted on May 25, 2017 (5777) By Rabbi Naftali Reich | Series: Legacy | Level: Beginner
It must have been chaos in the desert, a city planner’s nightmare, before the encampment of the Jewish people was reorganized in the second year after the Exodus from Egypt. The new plans called for the encampment to follow a rigidly defined grid. The people were to be divided into four groups of three tribes and placed to the north, south, east and west of the central hub in which the Mishkan stood. Each tribe was assigned its precise place in the scheme of things, with its own flag and tribal emblem.
Why did God put off the organization of the encampment until the end of the second year of the Jewish people’s sojourn in the desert? Why did He allow chaotic conditions to prevail for so long?
The commentators explain that it would not have been wise to create a formal pattern of encampment during the first year. At that time, the Jewish people were still in an early formative stage. Although they were all descended from Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, although they had all shared the common woes of bondage in Egypt, the idea of a Jewish nationhood based on the Torah and the covenant with G-d was still very new.
Each tribe had its own outlook and personality, which gave it a singular perspective on Torah and Jewish issues. Had the tribes been assigned to different sections of the encampment, there would have been a high likelihood that their ideological differences would lead to factionalism and dissension. At the same time, ideological differences among the tribes could also be a potential source of great national strength. The various perspectives could engender lively exchanges and debates. So how could the ideological differences be used to create a strong intellectual, emotional and spiritual vitality without leading to factionalism?
G-d’s solution was to allow the tribes to live together in one huge, chaotic melting pot for a full year. During this time, they would merge together into one nation indivisibly united around the core of the holy Torah. They would bond not only as a large clan but also as partners in the divine covenant.
But this condition could only be allowed to continue for a limited time. Otherwise, the tribes would truly melt together into some kind of a composite that lacked the focused strengths and virtues of each individual tribe. Therefore, G-d instructed the tribes to separate into a structured encampment in the second year, after the Mishkan had been built. The tribes would thus retain their individual character and still remain bonded to the rest of the Jewish people by their common connection to the divine Abode in their midst.
A man enlisted in the army and was assigned to an army base, where he made a number of new friends. After a few months of intense training, he was transferred to another base where he was given artillery training. One of his new friends was assigned to infantry training, while another was sent to communications school.
“What is going on here?” the young soldier complained to his sergeant. “If we are to be separated, why were we thrown together in the first place? Why didn’t they send him straight to communications school and where we fit? They knew his aptitude when he enlisted, didn’t they?”
“They certainly did,” said the sergeant. “Tell me, if you are called on to support the infantry in battle with artillery fire, will you rush to do it?”
“Of course. That is my job.”
“But will it help at all if you know that your friend is in the infantry?”
“I suppose it would.”
“There you go,” said the sergeant. “Starting with all the men together leads to greater sense of commitment.”
In our own lives, we also live in small separated units. We are divided from each other by our interests, our professions, our family backgrounds, our neighborhoods. But we must recognize that there is more that binds us than divides us. We are brothers and sisters whose ancestors stood together at Mount Sinai and heard the voice of G-d. We shared the memories, both glorious and painful, of thousands of years of history. Regardless of our differences, we are one people.
Text Copyright © 2010 by Rabbi Naftali Reich and Torah.org.
Rabbi Reich is on the faculty of the Ohr Somayach Tanenbaum Education Center.
 
Human Nature
Parshas Bamidbar
Posted on May 22, 2012 (5772) By Rabbi Berel Wein | Series: Rabbi Wein | Level: Beginner
The book of Bamidbar is perhaps one of the saddest, so to speak, of all of the Holy Scriptures. Whereas the book of Shemot, which records for us the sin of the Golden Calf also gives us pause, it concludes with the final construction of the Mishkan and G-d’s Presence, so to speak, resting within the encampment of Israel. But the book of Bamidbar, which begins on a high note of numerical accomplishment and the seemingly imminent entry of the Jewish people into he Land of Israel, ends on a very sour note. It records the destruction of the entire generation including its leadership without their entrance into the Promised Land.
The narrative of the book of Bamidbar tells us of rebellion and constant carping, military defeats and victories, false blessings, human prejudices and personal bias. But the Torah warned us in its very first chapters that “this is the book of human beings.” And all of the weaknesses exhibited by Israel in the desert of Sinai, as recorded for us in the book of Bamidbar, are definitely part of the usual human story and nature.
Over the decades that I have taught this book of Bamidbar to students and congregants of mine, invariably many of them have then asked me incredulously: “How could the Jewish people have behaved in such a manner?” I cannot speak for that generation of Jews as described in the book of Bamidbar but I wonder to myself “How can so many Jews in our generation relate to the existence of the State of Israel in our time so cavalierly?
How do we tolerate the cruelties that our one-size-fits-all school systems inflict on the ‘different’ child? How do we subject our daughters to the indignities of the current matchmaking process? How, indeed!?” And my answer to myself always is that for the great many of us, human nature trumps common sense, logic and true Torah values. I imagine that this may have been true of the generation of the book of Bamidbar as well.
One of the wonders of the book of Bamidbar is that the count of the Jewish people at the end of the forty years of living in the desert was almost exactly the same as it was at the beginning of their sojourn there when they left Egyptian bondage. Though the following is certainly not being proposed by me as an answer or explanation to this unusual fact, I have always thought that this is a subtle reminder to us that that no matter how great the experiences, no matter how magnificent the miracles, no matter how great the leaders, human nature with all of its strengths and weaknesses basically remains the same.
It is not only that the numbers don’t change much, the people and the generations didn’t and don’t change much either. Human nature remains pretty constant. But our task is to recognize that and channel our human nature into productive and holy actions and behavior – to bend to a nobility of will and loyalty. Only by recognizing the propensity of our nature will we be able to accomplish this necessary and noble goal.
Shabat shalom and Chag Sameach,
Rabbi Berel Wein

No comments:

Post a Comment